Software development


Standard terms and definitions must be defined and published. This includes establishing a standard naming convention with required data elements as part of the control. Accordingly, using the logical model, define what parts of an application will be designated as a service, what parts will be designated as an application, and what are the parts that are running on the server. IT infrastructure components must have a representation in the models and standard methods for modeling CIs and their relationships must be defined and applied consistently across the IT organization.

The span of Configuration control begins for the Government once the first configuration document is approved and baselined. This normally occurs when the functional configuration baseline (referred to as the requirements baseline in EIA/IS-649) is established for a system or configuration item. Configuration control is an essential discipline throughout the program life cycle. Figure 6-1 illustrates a top-level activity model of the configuration control process. It shows the configuration control process divided into three segments, which are detailed in Figures 6-2, 6-3 and 6-4, respectively. Configuration management is both a management discipline and a process.

For configuration documentation, the source may be in a specific repository such as SharePoint. This activity is responsible for managing changes and release implementation of changes to CIs and baselined configuration documentation by leveraging on existing formal change and release processes. It also ensures that only authorized and identifiable CIs are in the infrastructure and that there is a corresponding accurate and complete CI record representing its actual or physical CI. A configuration item is a component of a service or system that can be identified as a self-contained unit for purposes of change control and identification. A CI can be a primitive component or an aggregate of other CIs. The level at which a CI is considered primitive or aggregate is decided by the system in which it is created, maintained, and managed.

CCB: Configuration Control Board

These basic pieces of data help to facilitate the CSA process. But decision makers also typically add fields for additional information that would find useful. Figure 3.5 details the SCR process for Georgia NaviGAtor.

Setting effectivity to a future defined block of the CIs may be one solution. Combining or packaging a number of software changes into the next version may be another, etc. The Change Control Board will review any proposed changes from the original baseline requirements that were agreed upon with the client. If any change is agreed upon by the committee, the change is communicated to the project team and the client, and the requirement is baselined with the change.

  • This includes modeling the IT infrastructure to determine what CIs will look like and how they are related to each other.
  • It also controls change, making sure that its impact is assessed and that every effort is made to prevent erosion of product functionality or safety.
  • Software libraries must also be established for CI related documentation to maintain current baselines and previous versions.
  • CM establishes a disciplined structure, such that purchased, developed, or integrated configuration items are identified, controlled, tracked, and managed according to CM and organization standards and procedures.
  • In 2010, DPAS introduced new functionality for Military Equipment, Existence & Completeness, and Government Furnished Property .
  • In order for the CCB to operate as smoothly as possible, the tasks of each of the members must clearly be defined, and a chairperson must run CCB proceedings.
  • IT PMOs that develop a Program CM Plan may not be able to leverage on their ACIO CM Plan.

The CMS has several tasks listed in the plan that it is expected to carry out. The most important task is to keep all member organizations up to date with the most current procedures regarding the CM program and activities. Typically there are Change Managers or Change Analysts that reside in Engineering or Quality Assurance functions. These types of roles are responsible for managing the change control and review process between internal and external teams that need to approve changes. Briefly describe the project management framework, providing examples of stakeholders, knowledge areas, tools and techniques, and project success factors. The procuring activity’s CM office should publish procedures for CCB operation so that all members understand its importance to the acquisition process.

These audits are required to approve new baselines or prior to the installation of new hardware. There may be multiple configuration control authorities for a product with more than one user; each being a configuration control authority for a given contract. They cannot authorize change to either, but they may participate in the change control process if asked for input by either the configuration control authority that is the CDCA, or by the Government lead application activity. IT projects that acquire or make use of commercial tools and/or services, planning must be considered on what and how these CIs will be under configuration control and how changes or updates will be evaluated and managed.

Examples of Configuration Control in a sentence

Try our calculator to estimate the impact on your business. Input your business details, select a challenge, and see the real-world cost impact as validated by our customers. And It is difficult to see the cost impact of one or more mistakes. DisclaimerAll content on this website, including dictionary, thesaurus, literature, geography, and other reference data is for informational purposes only. This information should not be considered complete, up to date, and is not intended to be used in place of a visit, consultation, or advice of a legal, medical, or any other professional. Identify a change model that would effectively help implement change in your industry or organization.

All changes should be recorded with detailed information, which can be used to determine whether the change was implemented according to design. The CSA activities and the reports they generate go hand in hand, but are discussed separately. CSA usually involves the recording of information in a database, sometimes referred to as the CSA information management system. The information should be gathered from multiple sources—from engineers to management. Approvals may be necessary at higher levels, based on the nature of the project. The CM manager reviews the SCR to see whether it is a valid and complete request.

definition of configuration control board (CCB)

The quality assurance manager is to report on the quality of these processes at the regular CMS and steering committee meetings. The quality assurance manager also is responsible for overseeing all configuration audit activities. The specifics of change control processes among DOTs vary greatly, but the same general concepts apply. It is important that groups seeking to implement effective change control use a formal procedure to ensure consistency and acceptance. Change control is the procedure used for managing changes to the configuration of a system by evaluating a change’s impact, tracing its progress, and ensuring its proper documentation.

Any questions the auditor has about an item or CM procedures. For each of these divisions of CSA, similar information is recorded and maintained to provide decision makers with the information necessary to resolve issues. CSA should highlight any differences between a proposed change and the change as implemented. A robust software tool should be used in carrying out all CSA activities.

Section 2. Configuration Management (CM) Process

Whoever is responsible for compiling and reviewing all of the change requests should author a report to be reviewed by the CCB prior to the meetings. This provides time for CCB members to look over some of the requested changes, begin to think about their impacts, and how to implement the changes. During the meetings, each change request is discussed individually, unless grouped with a similar change request by the reviewing body. Recently, GDOT has established a change assessment and resolution leader to present the recommended solution to the CCB.

This also applies to any organizations providing IT services to the IRS, such as IRS Business and Functional Units and Managed Service Providers. Once the Project CM Plan is approved through the ELC Project milestone readiness reviews, it is valid for 3-years and can be used for subsequent releases contingent the overall scope and objective has not changed. This activity establishes the process for recording, managing, and reporting on the status of approved configuration documentation, including traceability of all changes. Findings from the Physical Configuration Audit that is used to examine the actual configuration of the CI that is representative of the product configuration to verify that the related design documentation matches the design of the deliverable’s CI. This includes validation of many of the supporting processes that are used in the production of the CI as well as any elements of the CI that were redesigned after the completion of the FCA also meet the requirements of the CI’s performance specification. The CM plan must be developed during the study period and must be augmented throughout the system life cycle.

The IT Change Control Board led by the Enterprise Network Management Office in IRM, manages changes to the Department of State’s information technology infrastructure. Because so much depends on the continuation of services of the Department of State IT infrastructure, change evaluation to it must be made definition of configuration control board (CCB) with an eye to the whole enterprise. Design flow means the maximum volume of wastewater estimated to be generated by a dwelling or non-dwelling facility in a twenty-four-hour period. It includes both a typical operating capacity and a surge capacity for the system during periodic heavy use events.

Chapter 3 – Configuration

This action was taken because in some cases the solution is too complicated or out of the area of knowledge of the person requesting the change. CI determination is the first step of CM after the development of the plan. It is how a transportation agency determines what is going to be included in its change control and what is going to be left out of its baselining procedures. The first step that CM managers use in CI determination is the statement of purpose of the CM program from the DOT or agency that created the system. According to agencies that provided information for this report, baselining saves tremendous amounts of time because it tends to minimize redundancy and the need to retrace steps. Baselining is essential in software development environments.

definition of configuration control board (CCB)

Additional meetings may be held in cases of emergency or large numbers of outstanding SCRs. The CM manager is responsible for determining meeting times and frequency. Standard meeting procedure involves the presentation of a recommended solution for each SCR either by the person that submitted it or by the CAR leader for SCRs requiring assessment. Based on the recommendation of any one CCB member, a vote is taken. If the vote is unanimous, the recommendation is approved. If not, further discussion is required until unanimous consent is reached.

5 Establish the functional architecture

Configuration Audit on the CMDB must also be performed by a Configuration Auditor that supports the Configuration Process Manager. The objective is to evaluate whether the Configuration Verification process is being performed including measuring the accuracy and quality of data in the CMDB. Configuration Audits may also trigger corrective actions required to reconcile the discrepancies and distributed to CI Owners for resolved. B. Under the operational environment, Configuration Management ensures the integrity of configurations required to control the services and IT infrastructure by establishing and maintaining accurate and complete CI records in a CMDB. The Southern California Priority Corridor CM Plan calls for both informal and formal audits of the system. Typically, the CM quality manager is responsible for ensuring that the audits take place and for determining what members of the CM team are to conduct them.

For this reason, classifying the changes into different categories based on their effect on the overall system is beneficial. Some changes may be minor enough that they do not require review by the entire CCB, but rather a subsection or even an individual member. All of these areas of focus are very important to developing change control as part of a CM program.

Security risk assessment checklist

Configuration control boards are best constituted by people with a variety of team roles, preferably coordinator and monitor/ evaluator . At least one member must have a good measure of diplomacy and courage. The _____ studies researched the effects of productivity changes in the work environment and the results led to the development of behavioral management. Find an organization that has recently been forced to increase or decrease capacity dramatically to align with customer demand.

Network’s ability to support the business process of the company. In 2011, DPAS introduced new functionality for Maintenance and Utilization, changes to User Accounts and introduced a new Support Site which featured an updated design, usability and downloadable resources. If the request is approved, it is passed to the SCR registrar who logs it into the SCR database and assigns a number. The SCR submitter is notified via email and the SCR is forwarded to developers for review. Before being included in the software technical data package. This is achieved by increasing the dissolved oxygen in Z2 and decreasing it in zone Z3 and zone Z4.

Configuration Management Activities/Products

One important purpose of its CSA system is to analyze the impact of changes on project activities or on the overall system. Using the reports generated by CSA, decision makers can evaluate the quality of system testing, system documentation, and personnel training. Configuration status accounting is the element of the CM process that involves recording all relevant information about configuration items and the CM program as the system undergoes changes. One of the primary objectives of CSA is to update an item’s documentation to reflect the most recent changes and the current configuration of that item. CSA is closely linked with change control and helps to ensure that each change has been properly documented. The primary output of the CSA process is current, accurate information, which will facilitate future changes to a particular item or to the system.

Personal tools

The priority of the assessment request is determined by the change manager. Configuration Controlmeans having the authority to approve or disapprove any and all changes to the hardware and software used in the data repository systems. The NaviGAtor CM manual requires the submission of formal reports to the CCB after completion of an audit. The report serves as the basis for the initiation of change request forms, which help the system conform to the requirements of the CM manual. If the requested change ultimately leads to a modification of the CM manual, then a change request must be filed and reviewed by the CCB in order for that change to take place. The Definition Phase – As the item is developed, information such as design documentation and engineering drawings is catalogued.

▪Change description, reason for change and who made the change, current revision of the design, date, time, etc. When taken together, these security control principles form the basis for the security requirements, which should be defined in any level of architecture and design. For Revisions to a Final Version, if the changes were minor and released within the same year, it is acceptable to use the next final version as Version 1.1, Version 1.2, etc. for multiple releases. However, if the changes are substantial and requires stakeholder review, then Step 5 or Step 6 must be followed. D. Subsequent final documents will have an increase of “1.0” in the final version number (2.0, 3.0, 4.0, etc.).